Preferences
Identification, demand, and litigation of preferential transfers. Proprietary analysis pairs with senior bankruptcy counsel at every stage.
CONTINGENCY PRACTICE / 11 U.S.C. §§ 547–550 · INSURANCE BAD FAITH · FIDUCIARY LITIGATION
01 Contingency Litigation Recovery active
Bankruptcy Recovery Group prosecutes preferences, fraudulent transfers, Chapter 5 avoidance actions, insurance bad faith, and other fiduciary claims — all on a contingency basis — and produces a better return for the estates and fiduciaries we serve.
↓ Scroll · 09 sections · All on contingency
02 Origin
We founded Bankruptcy Recovery Group because, in our collective experience, avoidance recovery had become inefficient — pursued too late and through a formulaic approach. We built the holistic, individuated alternative.
Read our full history§ I
Each portfolio analyzed individually, not formulaically — strategy precedes any demand.
§ II
Engaging avoidance counsel early in Chapter 11 informs plan negotiation and sale processes.
§ III
Experienced bankruptcy counsel on every claim — no juniorization, no handoff at the courthouse door.
§ IV
Same contingency model now extends to insurance bad faith and other fiduciary claims.
03 Practice
We treat each portfolio — Chapter 5 avoidance, insurance bad faith, or fiduciary claims — with the strategy and senior attention it deserves. All work is taken on a contingency basis.
Identification, demand, and litigation of preferential transfers. Proprietary analysis pairs with senior bankruptcy counsel at every stage.
Both actual and constructive fraud — under § 548 and applicable state law via § 544(b). Strategy informs settlement leverage from day one.
Post-petition transfers and recovery from initial and subsequent transferees. Holistic claims tracing for maximum estate recovery.
Insurance bad faith and other fiduciary claims — common law and statutory. Same contingency-fee structure, same senior-counsel attention.
04 Outcomes
Sourced from BRG attorney commentary published 2026 Q1.
60¢+
on the dollar
Average preference recovery on prosecuted portfolios.
Source — Insights, 12 Jan. 2026
40–50%
higher recoveries
Early-evaluation portfolios versus deferred review.
Source — Insights, 5 Jan. 2026
$100M+
recovered
BRG attorneys recently recovered over $100 million for a trustee on account of a bad faith insurance claim.
Disclosure: figures reflect representative portfolios; outcomes vary with case facts, jurisdiction, and evidentiary posture. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
05 Method
Every claim, regardless of size, receives individualized strategy and senior attention — from the analytic phase through final resolution.
01
Phase
Proprietary tooling and senior counsel scope the claim population — avoidance, insurance, or fiduciary — and the settlement posture before a single demand goes out.
02
Phase
Each demand carries a draft complaint and proposed settlement agreement. The package signals resolve and opens a clear path to resolution.
03
Phase
We seek entry of a procedures order requiring mediation. Time-efficient, cost-effective resolution — without the delays of active litigation.
04
Phase
When required, we litigate. Same senior counsel from phase 01 — no handoff, no diluted strategy, no unfamiliar faces in the courtroom.
06 Team
07 Insights
08 Resource
A practitioner's white paper on the systems we use to produce maximum recovery on Chapter 5 portfolios — from initial review through procedures motions and mediation. Covers the SOFA trap, demand-letter targeting, principled negotiation, batched complaint filings, and the contingency-fee math.
09 Engage
We work with trustees, committees, debtor counsel, and other fiduciaries across the country — on Chapter 5 avoidance, insurance bad faith, and fiduciary claims, all on a contingency basis. Tell us about your matter and we will respond within one business day.